Medicine and Mental Illness

K272 TMA01 Con statusr the usefulness of a holistic shape in explaining the come of affable wellness. A holistic approach to psychic infirmity marrow that the substance absubstance abusers physical, affable and constitutionual health along with the user s state of mind, lifestyle and social circumstanceors pass on all be taken into consideration when analysing them. Holism refers to treating the whole somebody. This means that holism feels complaint doesnt just affect the body, but also the mind and spirit as well.Its said that the five dimensions are all hide related and so if one is c hanged then the other dimensions forget all be impacted in some way or another. In a sense I feel that holism is operable as it explores several avenues in order to treat mental indisposition rather than the bio-medical approach which uses only one. The World Health Organisation (1946), pay back health in the following way a state of grapple physical, mental and social wellbeing a nd not merely the absence of disease and infirmity. This definition of health supports both the medical and social exemplifications.In suggesting that wellbeing is the key to health the definition embraces the idea that in the interference of illness all factors, social, mental and physical must be taken into account. If this definition is what professionals base their treatment of mental health upon, then it could be seen that the medical and holistic illustrations are intertwined and should in fact work in molestony. Yet one model holds dominance all over the other. It is the medical model which is predominantly used in the treatment of mental health (Bentall, 2003) The Biomedical ModelThe bio medical model evolved as a response to diseases in the 19th century. German psychiatrists then used this model, found on their beliefs and not hard evidence, to categorize the symptoms of mental bother into hard-hitting conditions, one of which was Schizophrenia (Bentall, 2003). The model suggests that mental health is an illness, characterised by specific symptoms that have a pathologic base. This came abtaboo be amaze research supported the design that mental ill health was due to chemical imbalances, body dysfunction or injury (McCullough et al, 2005, Pritchard, 2006).However there is another suggestion that mental health is a hypothetical construct (Boyle, 2002 14). The fundamental focus of this model is that the individual is the source of their mental illness. on that pointfore the person can be treated and as with most illness the medical model allow look at medication as the way forward (Beresford, 2005). deep down this model the body is seen as a device rather than a person and as an appliance its functions depart a lot need localisation (Giddens, 2006). This thought process is damaging, it can encourage a poor traffichip.When the person becomes lost and is seen as a list of symptoms, they become stigmatised and labelled. This labelling can cause further mental distress and so more symptoms may be seen (Thompson, 2006). The medical model sees mental illness as a superstar malfunction, an imbalance, a set of symptoms, to restore mental health the medical experts will endeavour to adjust the imbalances with a variety of drugs. The use of drugs often does lay d sustain a quick fix to some symptoms however the use often creates a dependence, which may last until death (Harris et al, 2007).This dependence on drugs will give further credence to the medical model. Many researchers point out that this reliance on medication causes further mental distress, as the side effects can be many and enduring, adding further problems to those with a diagnosing of mental illness(Wallcraft, 2005,Usher et al, 2006). The Holistic Model As we know the holistic model is not the most popular model, it is however very important as it represents a way of thinking and understanding mental distress and gives a positive approach to working with and supporting people experiencing mental illness. to each one persons experience of mental illness is unique. Seedhouse (2000, pp 59-60) suggests that holism makes two main claims that the whole cannot be fully understood dampenly and that they separate parts cannot be understood apart from the whole. Holism has many obtainable methods including counselling, and congestive behaviour therapy. Although all of these aspects work together each promotes its own healthful power, which doesnt really take a holistic perspective as it claims to. This can be very confusing and distressing for a user who has only ever encountered the biomedical model.A good modeling of this is (Taussig, 2002, p10) the recovery from breakdowns has always been slow and painful, and each one has brought a assorted treatment ranging from C. B. T therapy to psychoanalysis. On each occasion when I called on the providers to help me out of the dark, each stood proudly alone protesting their own therapeutic pow er and efficacy. Holism allows users to see how the body and mind are connected by letting them reflect. Reflection matters because it is continuous with practise.How you think nigh what you are doing affects how you do it, or whether you do it at all. It may take in your research or your whole attitude to people who do things differently, or indeed your whole life. (Blackburn 1999) However holistic approaches can bring the mind-body disjoint to the forefront as its been proven that reflecting on emotions can bring on physical distress such as raised heartbeat, headaches, and pains. Bringing supressed thoughts to the come forward can also cause people to become dependent on such things as alcohol and drugs which need some biomedical intervention.Mind-body relations are always mutual and bidirectional-the body affects the mind and is affected by it. mind and body are so integrally related that, in practise, it makes little sense to refer to therapies as solely mental or physical, rather mind-body could perhaps be best regarded as an boilers suit process that is not easily dissected into separate and distinct components or parts. (Seedhouse 2002, p55). . Whilst there are arguably opposing principles within the medical and holistic model it can be suggested that the diversity can be productive.There are aspects of both models that may help with the diagnoses of mental illness. The bio medical model through research will continue to attain for a specific, pathological base. Medicine aims to prevent mortality, with a high incidence of morbidity within the group of people diagnosed with mental illness, on-going research is a must (Muir-Cochrane 2006). The holistic model will strive to ensure, that the person with mental distress will have an individual programme tailored to their needs and therefore a selection of treatments may be the answer.The Hippocratic Oath which is fundamental in medicine suggests that interventions delivered from the medical profession of which psychiatry belongs do no harm Sokol (2008). If the so called experts used the model to treat service users with a diagnoses mental illness in a way that caused no harm they would strive to ensure that when assessment was undertaken all aspects of the medical and holistic models of mental distress would be taken into account.The complex nature of mental illness would be identified and a more impartial framework of support could be supplied. It could look at solutions and ways of coping, rather than problems and illness. It would value the service user with mental distress, building a relationship and remembering that mental illness it is not just an illness, a list of symptoms, there is a person present that needs to be respected. Perhaps the unification of these two models would enable the treatment for mental illness to be more people centred and unique. redevelopment users could define what help was needed, and the balance of power would be with the expert. (Warren, 2007 ). References Beresford, P. (2005) Social Approaches to betise and Distress User Perspectives and User Knowledge, In J Tew (Ed), Social Perspectives in psychological Health Developing Social Models to Understand and Work with psychic Distress, London Jessica Kingsley. Bentall, R. P. (2003) Madness Explained Psychosis and Human Nature, London Penguin.Blackburn, (1999) Bowen, P. (2007) Blackstones Guide to the Mental Health Act 2007, Oxford Oxford University Press. Boyle, M. (2002) Schizophrenia A Scientific Delusion, London Routledge. Giddens, (2006) Harris Et Al (2007) McCullogh Et Al (2005), Pritchard (2006) Muir-Cochrane (2006) Seedhouse (2000 P59-60) Seedhouse (2002 p55) Sokol (2008) Thompson (2006) Toussig (2002 p10) Usher Et Al (2006) Warren (2007) Word Count -1750 including references