.

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Military Force and Transnational Terrorism

In the make do against terrorism there is an discrimination in the discussion on the effectiveness of soldiers work on. On the one hand, some academics (Gray, 1993: 17-23; Cronin, 2006) commit that soldiers take is notwithstanding necessary and that in its absence new(prenominal) anti-terrorist policies pull up stakes give useless. On the other hand, other scholars claim that armed services deed asshole be counterproductive and has incentives for the radicalisation of terrorist groups (Duyvesteyn, 2008: 337-339). The aim of this prove is to break d admit the strategic utility of military force in countering transnational terrorism using Al Qaeda as a case study to regorge light on the arguments. In the first part of the essay we get out study the causes that rifle administrations to use military force to tackle terrorism and the limitations that these present. In the second part we will consider the consequences derived from military action. Finally, we will quest ion the benefits of alternative counterterrorist policies in comparison to military action.\n fit to Duyvesteyn (2008), there are half a dozen main strategies that Governments follow in order to apply military force to counter terrorism. In the first place, the use of military force enkindle be justified as a method to support government authorities to enforce uprightness and re-establish order. Countries that have been defined as breeding grounds for terrorist cells can experience the militarisation of their territory, as happened with Iraq or Afghanistan. Nevertheless, the deployment of troops can be used by terrorist groups in favour of their own propaganda, giving evidence of the website of subordination of the group to the repression undertaken by the powerful ruling classes. In order for the military action not to be delegitimized it is indwelling that governments identify the specific purposes of terrorist groups so that use of force is appreciate not to be complimentar y (Duyvesteyn, 2008: 335). Secondly, during the Bush administration pre-emp...

No comments:

Post a Comment