In Your Opinion, Why Have Economic Explanations Been So Strongly And Persistently Put Forward To Explain The Scramble For Colonies In Africa In The Late 19th C?

Economic explanations use up been so strongly and persistently prescribe forward to explain the becharm for colonies in Africa in the of late 19th because it probable is the to the highest degree reasonable and most possible rationale that can be presented to the world . until now , the real explanation for the scramble for Africa remains a point of moot for many historiansThere is , of course , some truth to the aver that the scramble for Africa was for economic reasons . The economy of the various over-embellished nations was surely un competitored concern , because Africa offered lots potential for enriching the colonizing countries . Securing a emplacement in Africa meant that that trade routes could be maintained . Investments were besides to a greater extent paying in Africa because of the cheap labor , the l imited contention , and the abundance of raw materialsControl of Africa was of significant strategic value in ensuring afield trade , especially because of the rivalry between the proud nations .

Britain , particularly , was under pressure to ensure that lucrative overseas markets were secured . entirely economy was not the only reason , although it whitethorn have been the most compelling , as Africa supplied raw materials such(prenominal) as metals , wood , etc , but not at a really significant level . The colonies turned out to be overpriced to maintain and defendNational prestige was also probably a cock -a-hoop factor in the scramble There was als! o much pressure to grab a piece of Africa , which was in force(p) postponement to be claimed . An anxious sense of competition among the rival imperial nations also possible played a bureau in the scramble for their place in the sun...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper